![fresno superior court smart search fresno superior court smart search](https://i2.wp.com/santaclaranews.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/img_4833.jpg)
Original Text Ĭommencing January 1, 2010, for all semiautomatic pistols that are not already listed on the roster pursuant to Section 12131, it is not designed and equipped with a microscopic array of characters that identify the make, model, and serial number of the pistol, etched or otherwise imprinted in two or more places on the interior surface or internal working parts of the pistol, and that are transferred by imprinting on each cartridge case when the firearm is fired, provided that the Department of Justice certifies that the technology used to create the imprint is available to more than one manufacturer unencumbered by any patent restrictions. But impossibility does not authorize a court to go beyond interpreting a statute and simply invalidate it." A spokesman for the NSSF said that no new models of semiautomatic handguns will be marketed in California. The court wrote, "Impossibility can occasionally excuse noncompliance with a statute. California, the California Supreme Court upheld the state's microstamping law.
![fresno superior court smart search fresno superior court smart search](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/97/ed/cd/97edcde5e20c1c4ce73581cc77ce8cb8.jpg)
On June 28, 2018, in the case of National Shooting Sports Foundation v. On December 1, 2016, a California Appellate Court reversed the Fresno Superior Court’s dismissal of the NSSF and the SAAMI lawsuit seeking an injunction to block enforcement of the state’s ammunition microstamping law and remanded the case back to the lower court to hear arguments. In February 2015 a federal judge upheld the microstamping requirement, ruling that it does not violate the Second Amendment. Two trade groups, the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF) and the Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers Institute (SAAMI), have filed a lawsuit seeking both declaratory and injunctive relief against what the groups perceive as an attempt to ban semi-automatic handguns in the state. They cited the microstamping law as their reason.
![fresno superior court smart search fresno superior court smart search](http://mediad.publicbroadcasting.net/p/kvpr/files/styles/medium/public/201601/fultonmall.jpg)
In January 2014, the two largest handgun manufacturers in the U.S., Smith & Wesson and Sturm, Ruger & Co., announced their intent to stop selling new semi-automatic handguns in California. However, handguns already approved for sale but lacking this technology may still be sold as long as they remain on the Roster of Not Unsafe Handguns. On May 17, 2013, California Attorney General Kamala Harris announced that micro-stamping had cleared all technological and patenting hurdles and would be required on newly sold semiautomatics, effective immediately. One group, the Calguns Foundation, paid a $555 fee to keep the patent active in order to delay implementation. Law enforcement agencies are specifically exempt. This technology was to be required in California starting in 2010, but requirements in the law that the technology be available unencumbered by a patent put it on hold. Microstamping legislation was passed in California AB 1471 and signed into law on October 14, 2007, but specifically exempts law enforcement. Legal jurisdictions in the United States California